Concerns have emerged within the higher education sector regarding potential modifications to revenue-sharing agreements overseen by the U.S. Department of Education, particularly in light of the presidential election results. Central to these discussions is the 2011 Dear Colleague Letter, which details the federal perspective on contracts between colleges and external service providers that offer various services.
Potential Changes to Guidance
Reports suggest that speculation exists surrounding the possibility of the outgoing administration revising this guidance to impose restrictions on institutional collaborations with external service providers. In response, Congresswoman Virginia Foxx, who chairs the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, articulated her apprehensions in a formal letter to the Department of Education. She urged the department to maintain the existing guidance, citing serious concerns about the potential disruption to educational delivery that could arise from abrupt policy changes.
Broader Issues at Play
The debate regarding the 2011 Dear Colleague Letter touches on broader issues related to regulatory interpretations in the education field. Various stakeholders are seeking clarification on the permissibility of revenue-sharing agreements with organizations that provide bundled services, including recruitment, which are currently allowed as long as institutions retain control over their admissions processes.
Legal Expert Perspectives
Legal experts have contributed to the conversation, indicating that concerns about the legality of these agreements may be exaggerated. They note that Chevron deference—a legal principle permitting courts to defer to regulatory agencies on ambiguous statutes—applies only in instances where an agency has undergone formal rulemaking. Given that the Dear Colleague Letter does not qualify as formal regulation, its legal standing may be more stable than initially assumed.
Historical Context and Legislative Endorsement
Additionally, interpretations rooted in regulatory practices from the 1990s, paired with bipartisan support across several administrations, bolster the argument for the durability of these revenue-sharing agreements. The reauthorization of the Higher Education Act in 2008 did not alter the wording concerning incentive compensation, implying legislative endorsement of prior regulatory practices.
Consequences of Revocation
Consequently, if the Department of Education were to revoke the 2011 Dear Colleague Letter, it could face substantial legal challenges based on precedent and historical regulatory frameworks. The framework supporting bundled services, which enables revenue-sharing agreements between universities and external service providers, appears to be more robust than earlier concerns indicated.
The Evolving Landscape of Higher Education
Current discussions about revenue-sharing guidelines highlight an evolving landscape in higher education, which may influence how institutions partner with external entities to improve educational outcomes and student experiences. It remains uncertain how the Department of Education will address these complexities in the approaching months.
(Source: Forbes)