Professors at the University of North Texas (UNT) have raised concerns regarding a recent decision to eliminate references to race and equity from the titles and descriptions of numerous courses within the College of Education. This change affects at least 78 graduate courses and approximately 130 undergraduate courses, as noted by faculty members in email notifications.
Changes to Course Titles and Descriptions
One of the significant modifications includes the renaming of the course formerly titled “Race, Class and Gender Issues in Education” to “Critical Inquiry in Education.” The initial course description aimed to prepare students for culturally responsive teaching and address stereotypes within educational settings that reflect inequalities associated with race, class, and gender. The revised description shifts the emphasis toward examining contemporary leadership topics relevant to diverse student groups.
Legislative Influence and Directive Responses
These adjustments were made in response to directives from state legislative leaders, including Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, who called for scrutiny of programs associated with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies ahead of the forthcoming legislative session. These directives are linked to Senate Bill 17, which abolished DEI offices in state universities and limited funding for DEI initiatives, although it did not explicitly prohibit related course content.
Faculty Concerns and Self-Censorship
UNT administrators have indicated that the changes were intended to protect faculty from potential scrutiny, considering that course titles and descriptions are publicly accessible. Faculty members are required to align their courses with the new guidelines by the fall of 2025. However, many instructors perceive this action as an unnecessary form of self-censorship due to anticipated legislative pressure.
Criticism from Academic Leaders
Brian Evans, president of the Texas conference of the American Association of University Professors, criticized the university’s actions, describing them as a systematic approach to limit academic discourse. Faculty members assert that the university is excessively conforming to a law that does not necessitate such specific alterations.
University’s Position on Curriculum Modifications
A university spokesperson emphasized that the changes were part of ongoing efforts to ensure that the curriculum meets state educational standards, denying that these modifications were directly prompted by SB 17.
Broader Trends in Higher Education
These course adjustments signify a broader trend observed at UNT and other Texas universities following the enactment of SB 17, which has led to the dissolution of DEI programs and diminished support for marginalized student communities.
Concerns Over Academic and Organizational Freedoms
Faculty members have expressed concerns regarding the implications of these measures on academic and organizational freedoms. Adam Briggle, a philosophy professor at UNT, voiced worries about the university’s willingness to preemptively restrict course content, questioning the balance between compliance with legal requirements and the preservation of academic integrity.
Tension Between Legislative Pressure and Educational Standards
Recent discussions concerning curriculum and faculty governance at UNT highlight a tension between legislative pressures and the commitment to comprehensive educational standards.
Source: Texas Tribune